OTHER TEXTS BY ANNALEE DAVIS


Connecting, disconnecting and intersecting at the Biennial of the Americas
Denver, Colorado USA. July 8-13 2010

By Annalee Davis

Edited by Amit Mukhopadhyay
Published by artetc., Emami Art Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata, India
Vol 2. No. 2.

connecting

I spent a week in Denver, Colorado in July 2010 as a guest speaker at The Nature of Things Speaker Series curated by Lauren Higgins. This series of journal entries logs my days at this month long, hemispheric event focusing on innovation, creativity, community and sustainability as the lens through which to look at the state of the Western Hemisphere.

Connecting…

DAY 1
I met Richard Saxton with his M12 colleagues – a collective of artists, designers and creative professionals that operate as a non-profit and an NGO. They create and facilitate research and education projects, exhibitions and commissions. M12 shared Redisenar los Campitos! for the Biennial. Campito, a Spanish term for a sheep wagon, houses migrant workers from Bolivia, Peru, Chile and Mexico, who work in Colorado as herders on ranches for up to three years. Men live in wagons without electricity, running water or a bathroom. M12 executed Redisenar los Campitos as a public art action focusing on collaboration, mobile design, landscape and social responsibility. M12 sees itself as a community resource for evolutionary thinking, exploring how contemporary art becomes a steward for innovative communication and effective global solutions. M12 designed prototypes to allow herders to live with access to a heated shower, compost toilet, solar energy platform, moveable garden, and global communication system. M12 will source funding to build one prototype. As an extension to M12, founder, Richard Saxton, teaches a course, The Baseline Group at the University of Colorado as a way to expand on ideas of sustainability, innovative thinking and social responsibility.

Disconnecting…

After conversing with Richard, his students, an activist and lawyer, I entered the Ellie Caulkins Opera House to attend the Americas Roundtable - the primary component of public dialogue throughout the Biennial. Debates included ten to twelve participants who discussed Climate Change, Philanthropy, Trade, Energy, Education and Women as Drivers of the New Economy. I attended the Roundtable on Poverty Reduction: Politics and Strategies...

read full article


Of People and Place
The Work of Annalee Davis

By Annalee Davis
Published by artetc., Emami Art Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata, India
Edited by Amit Mukhopadhyay
Vol 2. No. 1.

up-rooted

A bit of context

I was born in the Caribbean basin at a moment of transition from British colony to independent nation state. A menagerie of people imported from the four corners of the globe, our predetermined role was to provide labour for, or manage, the agricultural economy for absentee landowners. Unusually, these societies were contrived to support the economy, creating the first globalised space in the world, right here, in the belly of the Americas. Three and a half centuries later, as newly independent states, we were given the mantle to build a vision that would support our own aspirations. Lacking an autochthonous population for the most part, many of these newly independent island states in the early sixties had no indigenous context from which to define themselves. More than four decades on, one might question the degree of success to which our vision for independence has been realized.

From my location in the Southern Anglophone Caribbean, critical art as a resistant practice is transforming the contemporary creative arena though a proliferation of informal networks. Visual artists are linking with creative writers and critical thinkers to shape spaces of possibility – giving permission to make things, share ideas and provoke debate...

read full article



IDENTITIES WITHHELD BY CHOICE June 26 - 2008

A Small Axe Visual Arts Project



Identities Withheld by Choice
is a special project I formulated for the academic journal, Small Axe in Issue No. 26, June 2008. It is linked thematically to On the Map.

An error was made and two of the images were omitted from the printed journal. Visit the link below to see the complete project on Small Axe's website.



Questions for Team Barbados and the Panelists on David Ellis’ Down to Brass Tacks Programme on Migration, Sunday, June 21 2009

Note: I submitted the article below to the Nation newspaper on June 23rd, since it has not been published I am posting it here.

by Annalee Davis

Current regional debate on the issue of intra-regional migration is expanding the discussion and forcing us to address some of the more complex issues surrounding the state of the CSME and intra-regional Caribbean migration. Given statements made by some of the panelists on Sunday’s Brass Tacks and in the Sunday Sun of the same date, where our Prime Minister denied knowledge of ‘house raids’ in Barbados, I thought it would be useful to pose questions to the panel, the relevant authorities and Team Barbados, in an effort to further contribute to the debate. Read full article here

 


Thoughts on Prime Minister Thompson’s New “Amnesty”
By Stabroek staff | May 25, 2009 in Features

In the Diaspora

By Annalee Davis (Annalee Davis is a Barbadian Visual Artist, living and working in Barbados on a series of forty-five artistic projects that investigate the impact and anxieties of intra-regional Caribbean immigration. Please view www.creole-chant.blogspot.com to complete the questionnaire if you have a migratory experience you would like to share or www.annaleedavis.com to see her work.

On Tuesday, May 6th 2009, Prime Minister David Thompson politely informed Parliament of the policy determined by the Subcommittee on Immigration set up in June 2008. Non-nationals have one month to turn themselves into Immigration to regularize their status or be “removed” from December 1 2009... read complete article here

immigration

guyana workers

Note
In the Diaspora is one of a series of fortnightly columns from Guyanese in the diaspora and others with an interest in issues related to Guyana and the Caribbean morning, June 10th 2009.




Hiding and Seeking with Tonya Wiles (2009)

By Annalee Davis

tonya wiles
‘tongue’ 2008. Porcelain wash basin, leather, tongue. Dimensions variable.

I initially saw Tonya Wiles’s work at her first solo show, which opened at the Zemicon Gallery in Bridgetown on June 7, 2009. One week later, I attended her talk at which, according to Tonya, she wanted to “explain” her body of work to the Barbadian audience.

Her exhibition Hide and Seek played with established local norms about viewing art in a gallery space. I asked Tonya how different it was for her to locate her work in Barbados versus situating it in the UK, where she had spent the last three years. She felt that given the greater exposure of a UK gallery culture predisposed to understanding contemporary work, returning to Barbados forced her to ask the question, “Is art viewing universal?”

She wondered if the work made sense in a Barbadian context, and we spoke about how the work functions differently in the two spaces. UK-based viewers might be well exposed to, and therefore more comfortable interacting with, objects like Tonya’s in a gallery space, whereas in the Barbadian context the work reveals a tension. Hide and Seek exposed the conformity of a small, conservative, insular island society that prefers to know the rules of the game before playing. Members of the audience, Tonya told me, not sure what to do with her work, sought explanation from her before engaging or participating.

to read complete article visit smallaxe.net



Annalee Davis on JOSCELYN GARDNER (2004)


by Annalee Davis

Panel Discussion at the Barbados Museum & Historical Society in response to Joscelyn Gardner’s Solo Exhibition “White Skin, Black Kin: Speaking the Unspeakable”, May 19, 2004.

“The shaman is the person, male or female, who in his late childhood or early youth has an overwhelming psychological experience that turns him totally inward. It’s a kind of schizophrenic crack-up. The whole unconscious opens up, and the shaman falls into it…

The artists are the mythmakers of our day…they are today’s shamans who communicate myths for contemporary society, recognizing and rendering the “radiance” of all things, as an epiphany showing forth their truth.” Taken from Joseph Campbell and Bill Moyers in The Power of Myth.

Tonight, I would like to speak about this exhibition as “an epiphany of showing forth” our truths and to suggest that Joscelyn Gardner is a contemporary Barbadian shaman and that this exhibition represents a watershed in our ongoing and fractured development of cultural production.
First I would like to speak about the show from the point of view of this work being a creative body of work. These ideas are presented to us as art as opposed to any other format. Secondly, I would like to speak about the idea of schizophrenia as it relates to the work. And finally I would like to address the idea of wholeness. I am speaking about schizophrenia and wholeness both within the context of what we deem to be unspeakable.

It would be remiss of me as an artist not to address the technical expertise that Joscelyn so beautifully and proficiently displays. The process of physically making the work is something that Joscelyn enjoys as she very carefully renders, embroiders, writes, draws and prints these ideas into a form that is accessible to us – the thirsty audience. You should be aware that the pillow cases are made by Joscelyn, the embroidery is sewn by her hands, as are the topsy-turvy dolls. The photocopies of the prints that are hanging in the hallway pale in comparison to the limited edition, fine art lithographs that are on display at the Zemicon Gallery. Those carefully rendered drawings of black hairstyles are lithographs which are printed on frosted mylar. They are exquisitely beautiful and one should not miss the opportunity to see these works in the flesh.

I particularly appreciate the idea of Joscelyn using the Museum’s galleries as her canvas. I think it is a bold and daring venture to take what is a hallowed national arena and dance around the icons that reek of status, privilege and puffed up patriarchal chests, and suggest a topsy-turvy plantation space that begins to create a language which defines this nation’s history. Instead of a static display of inanimate objects, we now have movement, sound, rhythm, and voice; we have an animated space which breathes life into our history and honours the fact, with compassion, that we are bound to the vein. The Caribbean has propagated centuries of shame around our stories. We have been taught to be uncomfortable when history shows up at the back door, stating claim to our blood line. But now, thanks to Joscelyn’s careful words and works, we have a creative language that is starting to fall from our lips, we can begin to speak about the unspeakable.

As a result of this exhibition, the BMHS has become an even more provocative space and it might be interesting for the BMHS to actively involve artists in engaging with the space on a regular basis, to allow the cultural producers of this country to respond to the displays so we can continue to speak the unspeakable.

Secondly, I would like to speak about schizophrenia as it relates to the works on display. Schizophrenia is a mental disease marked by disconnection between thoughts, feelings and actions. The word makes me think about madness – a disordered mind, as well as it makes me think about schism - a split, rupture or division.

This show allows us to explore the tangled threads of history in an attempt to unravel the postcolonial mess we have inherited. Barbados, like the rest of the Caribbean, has been part of one of the world’s largest experiments in hybridity and its resultant creolisation. An innate part of this experience is the schism, schizophrenia or madness Joscelyn references in her catalogue by mentioning Jean Rhys’ character, Antoinette Cosway. I wanted to extend this schizophrenic schism to Joscelyn’s exhibition and suggest several areas where the splits can be seen in the works.

1. In a formal sense, the juxtaposition of what is on the surface with what is underneath – the schism between the beautifully and carefully rendered braided hair with the brutal torture implements.

2. The schism between the fixed portraits of the white Creole mistress and her children versus the fluid movements of the ghostly house slaves.

3. The division in the female sound works which talk about the various forms of oppression to which all women at this time were subject - .hearing in a ruptured way, the snippets of monologues and dialogues that are connected by circumstance but disconnected by hierarchy.

4. The schism of the topsy-turvy doll – a single doll divided at the centre of her being – a sweet, soft, cloth doll demonstrating an unresolved, split identity.

5. The schism of Pinky – the young white Creole girl who was sent to England to be civilized, who needed to perform as dictated by the colour of her skin, who then came to represent, ironically the epitomy of civilization, this White Creole. Joscelyn repatriates this girl by placing her in a Barbadian pastoral landscape, extending the schism even further.

6. The schism of how we see ourselves versus how others see us. The division between how a white Creole artist who sees herself as Barbadian; a native with the right to speak as a cultural producer about things of national significance, but who is often seen by others as an other. (Every one of us seems to have an other!)

7. The schism between an elite academic language versus the experiences to which we refer and which are lived by the average Barbadian. The division between the arenas in which these common experiences are written about and thought about versus the relative inaccessibility of these thoughts and words for the average person.

And finally, I would like to speak about the idea of healing as it relates to wholeness.

In the catalogue, Joscelyn states that the white postcolonial Creole woman “is charged with actively negotiating the re-construction of her own identity…”

I would like to extend this mandate to every member of our society, on both an individual and a collective basis. Healing is about making a choice. Reconstructing, or rebuilding our identity puts us in a position of power. This exhibition provokes us to think about the construction of our future in relation to our past, and some of the questions that we may ask are; how do we move forward, what is our next move? What steps have been taken by our postcolonial government to heal the wounds and move beyond the cycle of guilt and the polarity of superiority/inferiority complexes? How different or similar are we as a society today from the society to which Joscelyn refers in her work?

Nations can make steps towards healing which recognize at the national level that there has been rupture and we need to heal. Some examples of this at the national level are seen by the USA who created Affirmative Action as a healing mechanism. South Africa had their Truth & Reconciliation effort. Many Caribbean islands have become independent and some have become republics. Free education for all, is another step towards healing. Barbados formed a Committee for National Reconciliation in 1999 which has produced a report with suggestions for ways in which we can heal as a nation and move forward. This exhibition is an individual effort at healing which has been offered as a national gift for others to heal as well.

I wonder if the notion of healing, becoming whole beings who are healthy, happy and successful is a choice that is truly unspeakable.

Are we willing as individuals to heal and to become whole? Do we have a government that can choose to heal the wound and close the gaps?

I would like to close my presentation by recalling an article I read a few years ago when South Africa was undergoing their Truth & Reconciliation exercises. There was a story about a poor black SA woman from one of the townships who was in court at the trial of a white SA policeman who had brutally murdered her husband and only son in the most heinous way. The judge asked her to offer her comments about how this man should pay for what he had done to her family. She stood in the courtroom and she said; firstly, I want to forgive you. Secondly, I want you to come and visit me every month, because you have taken away my entire family and I need someone to spend time with me. And thirdly I want to adopt you as my son, because I have none left. The policeman feinted at the stand.

That woman, on that day, as an individual, demonstrated wholeness. And her leader, Nelson Mandela was a national example to her, as a whole person.

This is the unspeakable truth. To be whole is unspeakable. In a society that is heavily rooted in values which are oriented towards an external saviour, it is a challenging notion for many to think about taking the responsibility to claim a power to save themselves.

To affirm;
I am whole.
I am complete.
I am happy.
I am healthy.
I am the other.
The other is me.
I am.

This is speaking the unspeakable.
Thank you.

 
 

back to top